السبت، 19 نوفمبر 2016
Captain imprisonment of journalists and two members of the Board
The merits of a court judgment Hnh
Qasr al-Nil to imprison journalists Captain Yahya Qalash and Board members
Albulhy and Khaled Gamal Abdel Raheem two years in jail on charges of harboring
wanted security.
The court said in reasoning "and
where the availability of material element of the crime first racist, a
material behavior, and the second a psychological element of science with his
behavior to the availability of prescription request Abbt Almkloph in which a
person return his behavior has this corner available racist to allow these two
people asylum and shelter to journalists' Syndicate and accommodation
headquarters and overnight it has proven to the court that the statements of
both Amr Badr and Mahmoud Sakka in investigations second Shubra Al Khaimah
behalf in case No. 4564 for the year 2016 Shubra section of the tent, which had
decided in their agreement with the captain of journalists first defendant to
take shelter at the Diwan of the union until communication with executive and
judicial authorities of the State which he did actually the first defendant to
communicate with Lieutenant-Colonel Hazim Rashwan national security officer, to
implement what Atvgah him with the above-mentioned Badr and Al Sakka of a
solution with the executive and judicial authorities of the State.
"
It merits "does not get it what
decided by the first defendant that this contact was in order to ensure the
issuance of control and bring about these two individuals whether or not the
lack of knowledge of this until after the contact, 'independent since also
confirmed the incident and find out first defendant captain journalists are
understood required Illthma" .
She pointed out that what is seen by
both Hatem Zakaria member of the Press Syndicate Council Fathi Yusuf, a former
ambassador and director general of the Federation of Arab Journalists, in the
investigation that on April 30, 2016 at about one hour and a half late, and
during the presence submitted Hazem Rashwan national security officer, First
Office In the presence of the second, submitted Hazem Rashwan received a call
from the captain of journalists by telephone when submitted Hazem Rashwan
Qalash Yahia told of an order control and bring Amr Badr and Mahmoud Al Sakka.
She explained that it also proved knew
the three defendants testified Walid guild master security of delegates, the
second defendant and the presence of the first defendant summoned him and asked
him Bakkar Hall processing in the role of the union for overnight two then went
to carry out that request, accompanied by the third defendant to ensure the
readiness of the hall to spend the night, and also Mohammed certificate Abdul
Alim union security chief in the investigation in the presence of Amr Badr, and
Sakka on April 30 and watch for them on may 1, 2016 morning, the certificate
submitted Hazem Rashwan that its investigations found the accused Badr and Al
Sakka issued against them the decision of the public prosecutor Billthma have
went to the headquarters of the journalists' Syndicate on Saturday morning
April 30, for a sit-out were posted on some web sites, including the site
initially, who heads edited the third accused.
The merits of the Court, that the
officer confirmed receiving a phone call from the captain of journalists the
same day he asked to find a solution on the decision control and bring Badr and
Al Sakka in order to stall the implementation of the order and the first
defendant told it that it does not matter, but the implementation of that order
issued against them, but Qalash asked him to offer another solution to the
decision disciple. "
It also decided that its
investigations concluded by the first and second suspects processing hall
fourth round syndicate and the third defendant, "Albulhy" in
agreement with the Qalash and Gamal Abdel-Rahim to mobilize the masses of
journalists in solidarity with the defendants to create public opinion pressure
against the implementation of the decision of Billthma.
The Court is satisfied to these
testimonies and investigations above statement backed by the confirmed validity
What also proved to the court of her readings of the minutes of listening
attached to securities and by the court to make sure authenticity Login on the
Internet showing the existence of an article published on April 30 on the
website of the newspaper beginning and chair edited Khaled viewing Albulhy
third defendant under the title "Amr Badr, and Sakka entering the
open-ended sit in protest at the journalists' Syndicate Illthma and break into
their home," as the article is included in a waiting union solidarity
colleagues and the union movement.
Another article in the same location
under the title "Badr and Al Sakka also included Iatsman union and calling
journalists in solidarity with them," he proved to the court of the
existence of a video editing site ensures an interview with photographer
accused Amr Badr where the vigil decide the union is and fellow Sakka in
protest at the abuse against them and break into their house twice, and they
have been told by the Bar Council represented by the third suspect, Khaled
Albulhy and they are starting with sit-after telling him formally and they are
considered the Bar Council party in protest, as Sakka resorted to the union by
the workers feast day and it was said the issuance of the seizure and bring to
them and they heard are understood wanted to build a memorandum of
investigation national security and that they are willing to legal action
without being subjected to any violations.
The court also seen the video of the
tenth evening program, and the third defendant, said in an intervention that
Badr and Al Sakka for Jia to the union in order to search for the
implementation of this resolution by the union, and that the captain of
journalists is making contacts to approve it in a legal way, the sections and
articles which have proven to the Court aware of the three defendants ordered
seizure and subpoena issued against Badr and Al Sakka, the science of the
accused also confirmed by the statements of the third suspect
"Albulhy" investigations when asked "Did he and Captain the
further websites and what is being published news", he replied that it is
the core of their work follow-up to all that is written directly confirming
aware of defendants the issuance of control and bring Badr and Al Sakka.
According to a reasoning "and
proved to the court by the defendants to allow the required Illthma They are
signed they did shelter with the help of a private defendants Albulhy announce
their presence at the headquarters of the union and their declaration that they
were in the open-ended sit in protest against the police raid on their home, if
we assume the argument is contrary to fact, not knowing the defendants ordered
seizure and subpoena issued before them and did not turn the will of the
accused to accommodate these two sentences were ordered control and bring at
the headquarters of the union, because they allowed them to announce the
open-ended sit inside the union on a website headed edited the third defendant
before making sure of the fact that a warrant was issued adjusting the interest
of journalists' union so as not to enter a party to that and so as not to
become a haven for fugitives from the provisions required Illthma being allowed
them sit inside, but they have allowed so as well, and took him with evidence
of their knowledge by order exactly what prove to the court beyond a reasonable
doubt the availability of the mental element of the crime.
"
She added, "and prove to the
court the statements of Badr and Al Sakka in the investigation of their
agreement with the captain journalists to take cover union until its
continuance with the judicial authorities of the state, where it is if it was
their presence at the headquarters of the union without an agreement with the
captain of journalists to let him he or the rest of the accused to announce a
sit Mvetokh within the union."
She Alehithat "does not detract
from the commission accused the incident or undermine him, prompting him
accused the defense had not been proved to invite any of the three defendants
of the required Illthma to come to the headquarters of the union and shelter
them, so that as I have already mentioned that the stable upon doctrinal it
does not ask the owner of the shelter if absent when However, the presence of
the offender if the offender continues to leave the residence after knowing
that the authorities were looking for. "
She explained that lowered it on
Aqatna after assumption dialectical not to do any of the defendants invited to
Badr and Al Sakka shelter to the headquarters of the union, ask the court why
the three defendants did after learning recourse Badr and Al Sakka to the
headquarters of the union of harboring them, and hard to the court is to leave
them for shelter in the guild and provide moral support to them to allow them
sit inside the union and not to follow the actions to be taken in such cases,
which proves to the court to commit the three defendants to the incident, and
for these reasons, the court ruled in his presence sentenced each defendant two
years in jail and ensure that 10 thousand.
الاشتراك في:
تعليقات الرسالة
(
Atom
)
ليست هناك تعليقات :
إرسال تعليق