الثلاثاء، 26 أبريل 2016
Khaled Youssef's : Brotherhood «mesh Mahrouguin Ashan islands» but they describe their problems with «Sisi»
Director Khaled Youssef, a member of the House of Representatives and leader of the coalition of 25/30, said he voted for «no» to the government's statement that the program is built on the scientific method and lacks vision and has many problems.
He said in the interview for «home» that the educational policy in Egypt do not need to just change it needs «blown up from the ground», as we need a cultural project fully to confront terrorism because the confrontation is not only with weapons, but also in thought.
He pointed out that the House of Representatives approved the program because of the circumstance, which is going through the country and the fear of entering into the unknown, although we do not have to think in non-traditional solutions and stop «walking side wall», saying «After two revolutions is still our behavior is not characterized by any revolutionary ».
The member of the House of Representatives that «support Egypt» practices the vilest of the National Party, Members of «national» were «professional» Members of Egypt's support «amateur», and if insisted «support Egypt» on the same practices «Htody Egypt and the democratic experiment in an artful», He pointed out that Egypt's support will win, headed by 20 of the Commission at least 25 of the total because they are entering the election committees to the idea of transcendence does not participate.
Khaled Youssef confirmed that all of the slogan «Get out» for president in demonstrations are the Muslim Brotherhood who want to ride the public anger, stressing that it objector «Tiran and Sanafir» agreement but does not have any moment doubt the patriotism of the president and does not have the slightest willingness to raise Get out slogan, stressing that the popular «Sisi» is still very large, it is natural that this is somewhat less than the natures of things, pointing out that the demands of the Sudan and Bhlaep Shalateen hunt in murky water. And to the text of the interview:
■ Why rejected the government's statement?
- The voice of the government's program to «no» because the program lacks scientific method and vision, then mechanisms, schedules, and sources of funding, these components generally accepted government programs, the components do not exist in the government of Sherif Ismail, it is the program of its 150 pages are talking about projects economic and major projects nationwide, without placed within a clear development plan, or economic system, if the system is a socialist we find plans in place in this framework, even if the free market system will have another format, and so on, they are projects in the House of Commons without even knowing how to project management or the so-called «governance», we do not know how to project management, and whether private sector investors and participants in the plan, and the program also did not include what is the role of the state in development and how to stimulate the private sector and how to save the public sector from collapse.
■ But the program included a number of clear themes?
- If we talk, for example, the focus of social justice, we will find that the government understood as social protection, which is very dangerous, and if we look at the project «dignity», which is contained in the program, he is given to the poor, the elderly and people with special needs, pensions, guarantees, and that makes all of these categories as it is within the poverty system and the role of government to improve somewhat their situation, while I see that social justice is quite different, social justice is to have saved the children of the poor a serious chance in a real free education, and the opportunity to work live out a decent life, and create an atmosphere healthy and environmentally so as not to become infected by epidemics and diseases, this is what you'll get it out of the cycle of poverty, and thus improve their conditions, this is the social justice that respects the citizen, and does not deal with them as poor but deserving charity citizens with a fair share of the country's chances of social justice.
■ How do you see the rest of the program axes?
- If we look to the axis of education, you'll find that most of what was said by the government, is to «continue» or «complete well», and this means it believes that educational policy is set, or as the optimal policy, government permission have given me no philosophy or new insights fully to the development of education, politics education in Egypt do not need to just change it needs «blown up from the ground», and also if we look at health in the government program, there is no thought to how to develop the health system, but find many pages on how C virus resistance, and the question is what is the real development plan make health system run more efficiently than it is now? Then the constitutional entitlement provided for in the constitution, a 3% do not mention it, the private and the constitutional entitlement to health insurance affects all citizens does not mention him.
■ Do you have further comments on the program?
- Yes .. If we look to the axis of democracy, you will find that there is a page and a half page talking about democracy, there is not anything talking about establishing a democratic transition process as we build a modern democratic state demanded by the people on June 30, and if we talked about the culture in the program, we find that it does not There is no cultural project sponsored by the state, and can not find how to Adechna culture in the fight against terrorism, because the conflict in the foundation is not only a terrorist conflict, but a conflict of terrorist ideas, and this is the most important, and therefore we need a cultural project for the entire face.
■ reported refers to the absence of a program from the ground up .. why Parliament to give confidence to the government?
- Of course, no program, as I mentioned there are 150 pages of economic and major national projects, and the rest verbiage sender, the House of Representatives approved it, according to what they said in their speeches, we find that 90% of the House of Representatives said the letter that they are dissatisfied with the program and all of them monitor the reasons for not satisfaction, but they agree on the program because of circumstance who are going through the country, and we do not want to enter into the unknown, because the overthrow of this government means that the parliament is of the form the government, and if parliament did not succeed in forming and did not get the trust, will dissolve the Assembly and go back to square zero , these were their reasons.
■ Will a coalition «support Egypt» was able to form a government?
- Yes, and I told them you desiderating confidence in yourselves, and according to the constitution in the absence of the government for the confidence he forms the government, and I am confident that the coalition supporting Egypt can form better than the current vision of a better government, and their response was that there is a state of fluidity and mesh Hnaraf we Ende and parliament Hathal, and I am confident they Hikonoa in real real and liability limit if they formed the government, because if they failed to set up the parliament itself will solve, and therefore is this sword Msalta on their necks, we must think in unconventional solutions, and stop walking side Hait , after the revolutions that we still do not what our behavior is any revolutionary in any need, and moving as if the country in which two revolutions did not occur.
■ Are you moving in the right way?
- The national government's 100%, but this is an ideology, and we are not moving in the right direction, and if not corrected this path we are embarking on a disaster, I would crazy can not agree to this program because of the phrase, which is «that there is painful decisions we take» What is these decisions? How can you say to me that I I will take painful decisions did not specify however agree with him, what would I say to the citizens when they fall these decisions, do I tell them I signed a blank without knowing?
■ After a vote of confidence for the government and the end of the vote on the program What will be your role in the future?
- After the government got confidence, I am of those who said no to the government, but I am after giving confidence standing in the back, I and a coalition of 25/30, because we want the government's success, because its success will return to the Egyptian people, and the state is bound to succeed, we do not have the welfare of failure, and will rectifying mistakes, and we light her way, the basic work of deputies is our job to control the performance of the government.
■ What recent Ozmtk with Mohamed Abu Hamed details?
- Is an attempt to launch the situation in parliament, it will attack it would find it reply to him, Vmamed Obouhamd the top back in the three times I talked in a very sensitive issues, and every time I talk to be Mohamed Abu Hamed is the speaker after me directly, which of course is intentional coalition «support Egypt» this is a way of trying to terrorize the opposition which do not even speak, which is not going to happen.
■ What scenes of conciliation between you by the President of the Council, Dr. Ali Abdel Aal?
- What happened because I was determined to convert it to a commission of inquiry, not a victory for myself because it was not doing any personifying Since the first moment was less to apologize Mohamed Abu Hamed me, I say no, The debate was to convince me to accept the apology, was not between me and him is a personal issue and I wanted to establish the principle that it exceeds or misses the right of the Board or the Deputy or exceed the regulations governing the right to work, be held accountable uniforms no limit, it does not mean that it is Egypt's support for it is not held accountable.
■ Do you see that «support Egypt» resembles the National Party in the performance?
- He's conducting practices the vilest of the National Party, the National The party was by members of the pungent policy «professional», while Egypt's support «amateur», The support of a democratic Egypt understands that it is not majority rule only, but also conquer the minority, believe that the minority should not speak, and their breasts narrows when we say appended a dissenting opinion, the national party is before the revolution was shut up in front of the opposition at the time, which was domesticated in the foundation, the logic, you say what you will and we make what we like, and Egypt's support follows We do what we want and you do not say what you will.
■ The reason for this?
- Because they have a fear and mistrust, and fear that the newly says convincing affect the healthy members of the coalition of support for Egypt and take them from him, in the absence of party commitment, and thus «Agluh us» because our words sound convincing feared it.
■ Does Egypt bear it?
- Certainly not, I have said that the support of Egypt's current land has created «Huidy Egypt in an artful, and Huidy democratic experiment in an artful» When we process of democratic transition must be aware of it, and that minorities must have a clear, must give a wider range of in order to express their opinion, because this makes the political movement creates pluralism, political and vitality, which also creates a real parties exist on the ground.
■ Is this Parliament is that you want after the revolutions?
- Certainly not, but it is crossing all the confusion the case experienced by the Egyptian street, the payoff for this confusion, in light of the weakness of the elites, there are many circles because people crammed between bad and worse, chose from them, because there is no real elite ran, they fell and it failed.
■ How do you see the performance of Dr. Ali Abdel Aal?
- Dr. Ali Batasb when -mn point of his view that insults a House of Representatives, or skips public order in the existing regulation, as being responsible for keeping order in the hearing and the conduct and management of the hearings.
■ What do you expect in the election commissions?
- Egypt's support will win all the committees, which locked out the competition, and will receive a 20 committees at least of the total 25, they enter it with the idea of transcendence not participate, and imposed if you Aaoz benefit the nation and you are a national, looking for the most efficient for the presidency of the Commission, and behind it, even if it was not a member of the coalition, there is, for example, in one of the committees there are more than Vice specialist in its field, was nominated to support Egypt in front of her deputy from a completely different unrelated Committee specialization, and did not take efficient because it is not in the coalition supporting Egypt, like the Muslim Brotherhood slogan participation does not transcendence, At the other are Agalbon not involved, The support of Egypt, like the Muslim Brotherhood and not the National party, the National party is he makes an transactions, and there are no deals now because they are amateurs, I do not Odfhm for deals but do not even do Bmoamat, I do not even want to adjustments, but I want the people's interests, So where and how they met, people are realized his advantage when the chairman of the Committee specialized and efficient and no end Mentm to support Egypt and salvation.
■ What committees, which competes with them a coalition of 25/30?
- Compete on a number of commissions, including the Commission of Culture and Information, we nominate where Yusuf wheelchair-bound, and the beauty of Shiha on education, and Mohammed Abdul Ghani on housing, Haitham Hariri agency of the Health Committee, and did not do any Trbitat but talking with the House of Representatives, and we assure them you're seeing the fittest chosen.
■ «Tiran and Sanafir» How to deal with the Council?
- Parliament responsibility for your access to all documents and documents located under the hands of the state and found in any Hatta in the world, and we must submit these documents to look very delicate and reassure our consciences they Egyptian or mesh Egyptian, even if it turns out they are Egyptian, we do not have any income, whether parliament or the president or the people themselves, because the Bicol Constitution shall not waive any Egyptian land, but if we found it is Egyptian, is not free course of two things, either you right of sovereignty practiced on the island and therefore may not be activating the treaty only after consulting of the people according to the constitution, and the case the second is our management business on the island, and in this case the Council approve or reject, this is a democratic process of constitutional legal disorderly, and the Council if full responsibility did not realize in this subject, I believe that the country will be exposed to wind winds, because it will be there rift in our legitimacy if we all did not discuss it with precision.
■ Do not have fears that Egypt is trying to support the pass subject in the light of that circumstance is not likely?
- This is different, and would not dare to, the issue is related to the land, a historic responsibility to differ from the approval of the government, Agreeing to the government is Average, or Rvdhanaha Normal, too, but that is said in the era of Parliament Doe were ceded land in this piece was certain that it remains an Egyptian calamity.
■ you happy your presence in this parliament?
- Mesh forces, but I still have hope, and when I lose hope will not find me in the parliament, will resign immediately.
■ How do you see the demonstrations, which raised the slogan «Get out»?
- All those who said the president «Get out» are the Muslim Brotherhood who want to ride your popular anger theme of the two islands, and they want to pass to the world that there is a popular demonstrations against Sisi, I am saying that the demonstrations revealed is the honest citizens saree which have expressed their opposition to the subject of the two islands only , the idea of «Get out» it is the idea of a purely Muslim Brotherhood, and I am one of the objectors people on this agreement, and I do not have a moment of doubt the patriotism of the president, and I have no willingness to tell the president hit the road, when I say that parliament must be certain, I would emphasize the constitution says this talk, we will walk it literally, especially in such sensitive areas, if mesh Egyptian be Bntehr state's decision to a referendum, and if the Egyptian it be ended, and the parliament says, the president pardoned of embarrassment in front of Saudi Arabia, on the grounds that parliament is He decided a representative of the people.
■ How do you see the next invitations for demonstrations?
- I see it as an expression is real and is something dear to Egypt, and sees it as part of Egypt must express his opinion, it is natural that pretend to, but who wants to exploit and ride the wave there, Brotherhood is known about them Muslims that their ideology does not recognize the homeland of the National Owalparwa, and ideas originally internationalism, and said about Egypt «ou in Egypt», and therefore the two mesh Mahrouguin Ashan islands, but they describe their problems with Sisi, but the real citizens who believe they are Egyptian, went out with the purity of telling him «no» Mesh Hnslm ground, they have the right to do so.
■ economic situation and rising prices Is it possible to be fuel also demonstrations?
- This is part of our reasons for rejecting the government's program, he does not have an economic program victor for the poor, and relieve tensions in, which is already helping to demonstrations factors, and I hope that the national real people endures until the declaration of the parliament saw in the matter of the two islands, for they may discover that the parliament if the Egyptian capable to stop this treaty, even if Saudi Arabia is able to return it to the people, and then the sovereignty of the people, but I can not Osadr people's right to demonstrate because it is a constitutional right
الاشتراك في:
تعليقات الرسالة
(
Atom
)
ليست هناك تعليقات :
إرسال تعليق